Siegel v. Solomon
This text of 92 N.Y.S. 238 (Siegel v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is premature. The order is not final, but merely interlocutory and conditional. It does not adjudge the appellant guilty of contempt, and for lack of proper adjudication it is obvious that no commitment can issue upon it. Before the appellant can be committed, another order must be made, and from that an appeal will lie. Non constat that on an application for such an order something may appear to the court which will cause it to withhold the order. Brinkley v. Brinkley, 47 N. Y. 40; Greite v. Hendricks (Sup.) 24 N. Y. Supp. 546.
The appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.Y.S. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-solomon-nyappterm-1905.