Siegel v. Solomon

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Siegel v. Solomon

92 N.Y.S. 238

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 23, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is premature. The order is not final, but merely interlocutory and conditional. It does not adjudge the appellant guilty of contempt, and for lack of proper adjudication it is obvious that no commitment can issue upon it. Before the appellant can be committed, another order must be made, and from that an appeal will lie. Non constat that on an application for such an order something may appear to the court which will cause it to withhold the order. Brinkley v. Brinkley, 47 N. Y. 40; Greite v. Hendricks (Sup.) 24 N. Y. Supp. 546.

The appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is premature. The order is not final, but merely interlocutory and conditional. It does not adjudge the appellant guilty of contempt, and for lack of proper adjudication it is obvious that no commitment can issue upon it. Before the appellant can be committed, another order must be made, and from that an appeal will lie. Non constat that on an application for such an order something may appear to the court which will cause it to withhold the order. Brinkley v. Brinkley, 47 N. Y. 40; Greite v. Hendricks (Sup.) 24 N. Y. Supp. 546.

The appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Siegel v. Solomon, 92 N.Y.S. 238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

92 N.Y.S. 238 (Siegel v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related