Siegel v. Siegel
543 So. 2d 785, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 967, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2013, 1989 WL 36173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1989·No. Nos. 88-737, 88-1275·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
There is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the mother’s motion for modification of child support in light of the evidence of changed circumstances. Department of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Walker, 411 So.2d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
The issue of the husband’s equity in the marital home was never presented to the trial court and, therefore, cannot be considered on appeal. Dober v. Worrell, 401 So.2d 1322 (Fla.1981); Sparta State Bank v. Pape, 477 So.2d 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Siegel v. Siegel, 543 So. 2d 785, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 967, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2013, 1989 WL 36173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
543 So. 2d 785 (Siegel v. Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fischer v. Metcalf
543 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)