Siegel v. Seidenberg
237 A.D. 129, 261 N.Y.S. 350, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. A judgment directing the payment of a sum of money is enforcible only by execution. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 504, 505; Harris v. Elliott, 163 N. Y. 269.)
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Siegel v. Seidenberg, 237 A.D. 129, 261 N.Y.S. 350, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
237 A.D. 129 (Siegel v. Seidenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Kramsky
172 Misc. 935 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)