Siegel v. Seidenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siegel v. Seidenberg

237 A.D. 129, 261 N.Y.S. 350, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D. 129 (Siegel v. Seidenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siegel v. Seidenberg, 237 A.D. 129, 261 N.Y.S. 350, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. A judgment directing the payment of a sum of money is enforcible only by execution. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 504, 505; Harris v. Elliott, 163 N. Y. 269.)

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. A judgment directing the payment of a sum of money is enforcible only by execution. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 504, 505; Harris v. Elliott, 163 N. Y. 269.)

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 129, 261 N.Y.S. 350, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-seidenberg-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack