Siegel v. R. C. Williams & Co.
3 A.D.2d 902, 163 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5371
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1957
StatusPublished
This text of 3 A.D.2d 902 (Siegel v. R. C. Williams & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Siegel v. R. C. Williams & Co., 3 A.D.2d 902, 163 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Although an accounting is not the proper relief or remedy, the pleading is sufficient to comprise a defense or counterclaim for unjust enrichment. Concur — Peek, P. J., Botein, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.2d 902, 163 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-r-c-williams-co-nyappdiv-1957.