Siegel v. Helmick

999 N.E.2d 694, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 2013
Docket2013-1634
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 694 (Siegel v. Helmick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegel v. Helmick, 999 N.E.2d 694, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On complaint in mandamus of Richard Siegel. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 determination, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 694, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-helmick-ohio-2013.