Siegel v. Goodman
186 Misc. 108, 59 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2636
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 186 Misc. 108 (Siegel v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Siegel v. Goodman, 186 Misc. 108, 59 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
Opinion
The complaint should have been dismissed at the end of plaintiff’s case. Under section 33-c of the Personal Property Law, there could be no modification of the written agreement unless in writing.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Martens v. General Foods Corp.
276 A.D.2d 1053 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
186 Misc. 108, 59 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-goodman-nyappterm-1945.