Siegel v. Crawford

265 A.D. 877, 38 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6292

This text of 265 A.D. 877 (Siegel v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegel v. Crawford, 265 A.D. 877, 38 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

The only method of review available is by a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. (Matter of Pugh v. Winter, 166 Misc. Rep. 95; modfd. and affd., 253 App. Div. 295.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pugh v. Winter
253 A.D. 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Pugh v. Winter
166 Misc. 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 877, 38 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-crawford-nyappdiv-1942.