Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Siegel v. City of New York

Siegel v. City of New York

271 A.D.2d 679, 707 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 679 (Siegel v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegel v. City of New York, 271 A.D.2d 679, 707 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated March 9, 1999, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) to strike the answer of the defendant City of New York.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to strike the defendant’s answer (see, CPLR 3126; Fellin v Sahgal, 268 AD2d 456; Kamar v City of New York, 262 AD2d 57; Smith v New York Tel. Co., 235 AD2d 529). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. New York Telephone Co.
235 A.D.2d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Kamar v. City of New York
262 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Fellin v. Sahgal
268 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 679, 707 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2000.