Siegel v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.
This text of 515 So. 2d 299 (Siegel v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Designers Tile Int’l Corp. v. Capitol C. Corp., 499 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (defendants entitled to directed verdict where plaintiff presented no evidence to support its claim), rev. denied, 508 So.2d 13 (Fla.1987); Rosa v. Florida Coast Bank, 484 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (trial court correct in setting aside jury verdict for plaintiff and directing verdict for defendant where plaintiff failed to establish essential elements of claim); Williams v. Meyer, 474 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (directed verdict proper where evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom failed to prove plaintiffs case).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 So. 2d 299, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2479, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-automated-medical-laboratories-inc-fladistctapp-1987.