Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges

10 A.D.2d 646, 197 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11657

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action by a partnership to recover for necessaries furnished to an infant against the infant and his father, a member of the partnership, the appeal is from an order granting the infant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). The Special Term held that to permit the maintenance of this action would contravene public policy. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ. [20 Misc 2d 243.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a partnership to recover for necessaries furnished to an infant against the infant and his father, a member of the partnership, the appeal is from an order granting the infant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). The Special Term held that to permit the maintenance of this action would contravene public policy. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ. [20 Misc 2d 243.]

Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges, 10 A.D.2d 646, 197 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

10 A.D.2d 646 (Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related