Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges

10 A.D.2d 646, 197 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11657
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 646 (Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges, 10 A.D.2d 646, 197 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

In an action by a partnership to recover for necessaries furnished to an infant against the infant and his father, a member of the partnership, the appeal is from an order granting the infant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). The Special Term held that to permit the maintenance of this action would contravene public policy. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ. [20 Misc 2d 243.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Spell
140 Misc. 2d 847 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.2d 646, 197 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-hodges-v-hodges-nyappdiv-1960.