Home/New York Court of Appeals/Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges

Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges

174 N.E.2d 533, 9 N.Y.2d 747
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 N.E.2d 533 (Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges, 174 N.E.2d 533, 9 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fitld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judge Burke dissents in the following memorandum: The complaint states a cause of action for services performed but any recovery must be limited to the value of services rendered by Siegel alone. I do not think that Special Term and the majority are correct in holding that Siegel can bring an action in his individual capacity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Spell
140 Misc. 2d 847 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1988)
Mount Sinai Hospital v. Burns
133 Misc. 2d 707 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.E.2d 533, 9 N.Y.2d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-hodges-v-hodges-ny-1961.