Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries

187 Misc. 263, 63 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2385
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 28, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The landlord’s-failure to paint tenant’s apartment, thereby breaching the alleged agreement to do so is no defense to the proceeding for nonpayment of the due rent (Douglas v. Chesebrough Building Co., 56 App. Div. 403; 1225 Fulton Avenue Corporation v. Carbonell, 24 N. Y. S. 2d 749).

). The final order should be modified by striking therefrom the provisions qualifying the landlord’s right to withdraw the money deposited in the court below to the credit of the landlord, and as modified affirmed without, prejudice to any claim the tenant may have against the landlord for breach of alleged agreement to paint her apartment.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries, 187 Misc. 263, 63 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

187 Misc. 263 (Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re City Bank Farmers Trust Co.
192 Misc. 1042 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)