Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries

187 Misc. 263, 63 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2385

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 Misc. 263 (Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siegel Equities, Inc. v. Farries, 187 Misc. 263, 63 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The landlord’s-failure to paint tenant’s apartment, thereby breaching the alleged agreement to do so is no defense to the proceeding for nonpayment of the due rent (Douglas v. Chesebrough Building Co., 56 App. Div. 403; 1225 Fulton Avenue Corporation v. Carbonell, 24 N. Y. S. 2d 749).

). The final order should be modified by striking therefrom the provisions qualifying the landlord’s right to withdraw the money deposited in the court below to the credit of the landlord, and as modified affirmed without, prejudice to any claim the tenant may have against the landlord for breach of alleged agreement to paint her apartment.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI