Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Schueck

60 Ill. App. 429, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 301
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 31, 1895·Published

Opinion

Mb. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Coubt.

This appeal is from a judgment recovered in a garnishment proceeding against the appellant upon a certain alleged judgment against the appellees in favor of Edward A. Prior & Co.

However gratifying it might be to discuss all the questions urged upon ns there is one vital error insisted upon by appellant to which we must, in the press of a large docket, confine ourselves.

The record is absolutely bare of any evidence of the alleged judgment upon which the garnishment purports to he founded. This is fatal. There must be a judgment upon which execution can issue against the judgment debtor. Gilcreest v. Savage, for use, etc., 44 Ill. 56; Pierce v. Wade, 19 Ill. App. 185; McNeill v. Donohue, 44 Ill. App. 42. The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Schueck, 60 Ill. App. 429, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 301 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

60 Ill. App. 429 (Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Schueck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilcreest v. Savage
44 Ill. 56 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1867)
Pierce v. Wade
19 Ill. App. 185 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)
McNeill v. Donohue
44 Ill. App. 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)