Siefke v. Siefke
21 Misc. 407, 47 N.Y.S. 953
Opinion
The motion is made to strike the cause from, the calendar for the reason that the notice of trial was served for the June term of 1895, whereas the note of issue was not filed until March 21, 1896, some nine months after the commencement of that term. As no note of issue was filed for the term for which the cause was noticed for trial, the notice is ineffectual, and the motion must be granted. See Gowing v. Levy, 17 N. Y. Supp. 771; also Nationalizing Carbonating Co. v. Standard Aerating Co., Law Journal of October 27, 1896.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Siefke v. Siefke, 21 Misc. 407, 47 N.Y.S. 953 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).
21 Misc. 407 (Siefke v. Siefke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weaver v. Miller
187 A.D. 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Siefke v. Siefke
55 N.Y.S. 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Mangone v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
48 N.Y.S. 644 (New York Supreme Court, 1897)