Siebrecht v. Siebrecht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siebrecht v. Siebrecht

159 A.D. 925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 A.D. 925 (Siebrecht v. Siebrecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siebrecht v. Siebrecht, 159 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

— Interlocutory judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event, on the ground that there is no sufficient evidence of adulterous act save on a single occasion at Hawleyville, and as to that the evidence shows that the possible range of vision did not permit the view to which the inculpating witness testified. Hence the finding is against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., voted for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Interlocutory judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event, on the ground that there is no sufficient evidence of adulterous act save on a single occasion at Hawleyville, and as to that the evidence shows that the possible range of vision did not permit the view to which the inculpating witness testified. Hence the finding is against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., voted for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siebrecht-v-siebrecht-nyappdiv-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack