Siebrecht v. Siebrecht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siebrecht v. Siebrecht

159 A.D. 925

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Interlocutory judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event, on the ground that there is no sufficient evidence of adulterous act save on a single occasion at Hawleyville, and as to that the evidence shows that the possible range of vision did not permit the view to which the inculpating witness testified. Hence the finding is against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., voted for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Interlocutory judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event, on the ground that there is no sufficient evidence of adulterous act save on a single occasion at Hawleyville, and as to that the evidence shows that the possible range of vision did not permit the view to which the inculpating witness testified. Hence the finding is against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., voted for affirmance.

Siebrecht v. Siebrecht, 159 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

159 A.D. 925 (Siebrecht v. Siebrecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related