Siebold v. Zieboldt

116 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 500, 8 Stock. 500, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 323
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for- the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. - ■ ■•• •

For .affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iief-Just-IGE, Swayze, TrencHard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbagh, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siebold v. Zieboldt, 116 A. 926, 93 N.J. Eq. 500, 8 Stock. 500, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1922).

116 A. 926 (Siebold v. Zieboldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christian v. Canfield
155 A. 788 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)
In Re Fulper
99 N.J. Eq. 293 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1926)