Siebert v. Florida Department of Corrections

927 So. 2d 1022, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6087, 2006 WL 1096155
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0544·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss filed on February 28, 2006, as well as the appellant’s response thereto, the Court has determined that the “Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Relief’ is not an appealable order. See Bennett’s Leasing, Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp., 870 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); see also Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. [1023]*10231st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siebert v. Florida Department of Corrections, 927 So. 2d 1022, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6087, 2006 WL 1096155 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

927 So. 2d 1022 (Siebert v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Bennett's Leasing, Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp.
870 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)