Siebert v. City of Vero Beach

555 So. 2d 983, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 517, 1990 WL 6560
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1990·No. No. 89-0558·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At issue is the final judgment for taxation of costs against appellant. We reverse as to the cost of the appraisal. See Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions § 2; § 92.231, Fla. Stat. (1987); Caceres v. Physicians Protective Trust Fund, 489 So.2d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); KMS of Florida Corp. v. Magna Properties, Inc., 464 So.2d 234 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

However, as to the costs of depositions, while the guidelines place the burden of proving need upon the party incurring costs for depositions not used, the appellate record is the responsibility of appellant. We have no transcript of the hearing on the motion to tax costs and cannot determine what the trial court was presented. Accordingly, we affirm as to the costs of depositions.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE, JJ., and MUSSELMAN, JACK, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siebert v. City of Vero Beach, 555 So. 2d 983, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 517, 1990 WL 6560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

555 So. 2d 983 (Siebert v. City of Vero Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seabrooks v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.
745 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Hyster Co. v. Stephens
560 So. 2d 1334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)