Sieber v. Rose

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 31, 2011
• Docket: 10-2341
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2341

In re: STEPHEN CHARLES SIEBER,

Debtor.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

STEPHEN CHARLES SIEBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHERYL E. ROSE,

Trustee – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10- cv-02470-RWT; BK-07-21192; AP-10-00421)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Charles Sieber, Appellant Pro Se. James Martin Hoffman, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen Charles Sieber seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying him permission to file documents in his

bankruptcy appeal under the electronic filing system. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The

order Sieber seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED