Sieben v. United States
This text of Sieben v. United States (Sieben v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MARY V. SIEBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-5091 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 11-CV-0878, Judge Edward J. Damich. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Min- neapolis, Minnesota argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was HARRY A. SIEBEN, JR., Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum & Carey, of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
JOSHUA A. MANDLEBAUM, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Direc- tor, and DEBORAH A. BYNUM, Assistant Director. Of counsel was DAVID H. CAZIER, United States Air Force, Commercial Litigation Field Support Center, AFLOA/JAQ, of Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sieben v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sieben-v-united-states-cafc-2014.