Sidrane v. Muss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sidrane v. Muss

30 A.D.2d 751, 292 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3609

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 751 (Sidrane v. Muss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sidrane v. Muss, 30 A.D.2d 751, 292 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the defendants from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to set forth a cause of action. At this juncture of the proceeding no answer has been interposed. The allegations set forth in the complaint as to the terms and conditions contained in the deed are sufficiently ambiguous so as to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the defendants from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to set forth a cause of action. At this juncture of the proceeding no answer has been interposed. The allegations set forth in the complaint as to the terms and conditions contained in the deed are sufficiently ambiguous so as to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 751, 292 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidrane-v-muss-nyappdiv-1968.