Sidney v. State
755 S.W.2d 614, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 860, 1988 WL 62841
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sidney v. State, 755 S.W.2d 614, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 860, 1988 WL 62841 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
755 S.W.2d 614 (Sidney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)