Sidney J. Massicot v. United States
This text of 266 F.2d 955 (Sidney J. Massicot v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal from the denial by the trial court of a motion to vacate appellant’s sentence of conviction for violating Sections 605 and 501 of the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 605, 501, presents no real constitutional question. The Supreme Court, in Weiss v. United States, 308 U.S. 321, 60 S.Ct. 269, 84 L.Ed. 298, construed Section 605 as forbidding interception and publication of any communication, whether interstate or intrastate. It was for the interception and publication of an intrastate message that Massicot was indicted. The language plainly says what the Supreme Court construed it to mean. It is only by seeking to construe the plain statement to have a limited meaning that appellant gives any meaning at all to his contention that the section is too vague to be the constitutional basis for a criminal prosecution. See Massicot v. United States, 5 Cir., 254 F.2d 58.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 F.2d 955, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidney-j-massicot-v-united-states-ca5-1959.