Sidney B. Bowman Cycle Co. v. Dyer

City of New York Municipal Court

Sidney B. Bowman Cycle Co. v. Dyer

23 Misc. 767, 53 N.Y.S. 1114

DecidedApril 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Misc. 767 (Sidney B. Bowman Cycle Co. v. Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sidney B. Bowman Cycle Co. v. Dyer, 23 Misc. 767, 53 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit upon which the order herein was granted shows that Mr. Bowman, the plaintiff’s president, made the lease and had personal knowledge of all the dealings between plaintiff and defendants, and that as such officer he had no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief concerning the matters set forth in defendants’ answer, and upon which they based their alleged counterclaim, and that it was necessary for him to have a bill of particulars of such counterclaim before he could frame his reply to said counterclaim. In our judgment, such affidavit was sufficient and entitled plaintiff to the order appealed from.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Eitzsimohs, Oh. J., and O’Dwyer, J.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The affidavit upon which the order herein was granted shows that Mr. Bowman, the plaintiff’s president, made the lease and had personal knowledge of all the dealings between plaintiff and defendants, and that as such officer he had no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief concerning the matters set forth in defendants’ answer, and upon which they based their alleged counterclaim, and that it was necessary for him to have a bill of particulars of such counterclaim before he could frame his reply to said counterclaim. In our judgment, such affidavit was sufficient and entitled plaintiff to the order appealed from.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Eitzsimohs, Oh. J., and O’Dwyer, J.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Misc. 767, 53 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidney-b-bowman-cycle-co-v-dyer-nynyccityct-1898.