Sidman v. Dougherty

Eleventh Circuit

Sidman v. Dougherty

698 F. App'x 590

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 3, 2017·No. No. 15-15000·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, this Court finds no reversible error in the district court’s October 6, 2015 order denying Appellant Joseph P. Dougherty’s request for costs and attorney’s fees or in the district court’s April 19, 2016 order denying Appellant Dough-erty’s motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm both of the district court’s orders.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, this Court finds no reversible error in the district court’s October 6, 2015 order denying Appellant Joseph P. Dougherty’s request for costs and attorney’s fees or in the district court’s April 19, 2016 order denying Appellant Dough-erty’s motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm both of the district court’s orders.

AFFIRMED.

Sidman v. Dougherty, 698 F. App'x 590 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

698 F. App'x 590 (Sidman v. Dougherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.