Sidhu v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 21, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-01020·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 GURPREET SIDHU, Case No. 1:19-cv-01020-BAK 12 Plaintiff, 13 V. ORDER RE: STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (ECF No. 49) 15 AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 19 49.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 29 41€a)C)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 21 Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: _ July 21, 2022 fe ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sidhu v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Sidhu v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Sidhu v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)