Sidhom v. Wente

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 2019·No. 78373·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID SIDHOM, No, 78373 Appellant,

vs.

MELANIE WENTE,

Respondent.

FILED APR 0 8 2019 ELIZABETH A. DROWN CLERK OFITREME COURT

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order entered in a marriage dissolution case. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Cheryl B. Moss, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). The order denies an order to show cause on a temporary basis, issues a "no contact" order between the parties, modifies an order for temporary support, sets a settlement conference date, directs appellant to file his work-search journals, and directs the parties to prepare their tax returns. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e )512.2..

provides for an appeal from the challenged order. This court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

frea_41\

Hardesty

.44Ltbaug J.

Stiglich

J.

Silver

cc: Hon. Cheryl B. Moss, District Judge, Family Court Division David Sidhom Robert Blau, Esq., PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947T (441919

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sidhom v. Wente, (Neb. 2019).

Sidhom v. Wente (Sidhom v. Wente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)