Sidhari v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sidhari v. City of New York

71 A.D.3d 982, 896 N.Y.S.2d 683

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.3d 982 (Sidhari v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sidhari v. City of New York, 71 A.D.3d 982, 896 N.Y.S.2d 683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated September 30, 2009, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of serious injury, with leave to renew upon completion of discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of serious injury, with leave to renew upon completion of discovery (see CPLR 3212 [f]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated September 30, 2009, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of serious injury, with leave to renew upon completion of discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of serious injury, with leave to renew upon completion of discovery (see CPLR 3212 [f]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 982, 896 N.Y.S.2d 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidhari-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2010.