Sides v. Hilleary

6 H. & J. 86
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 H. & J. 86 (Sides v. Hilleary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sides v. Hilleary, 6 H. & J. 86 (Md. 1823).

Opinion

Tltó opinion of the court was delivered by

Buchanan, J.'

If the plaintiff, at the time of taking the promissory note on which the suit is founded, knew that the mill-stories, which formed the consideration of the note, were defective; arid fraudulently concealed that defect from the defendant, the consideration wholly failed, and no suit could be sustained bn the note. Whetherthe plaintiff had or not a knowledge of the defect alleged, and concealed that knowledge from the defendant, was a question for the jury on the evidence, and the court could not [89]*89'properly have instructed them, as prayed, that the. plain« tiff was entitled to recover.

áu»sheet affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dudoussat
17 So. 685 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 H. & J. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sides-v-hilleary-md-1823.