Sides v. Hilleary

6 H. & J. 86
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Tltó opinion of the court was delivered by

Buchanan, J.'

If the plaintiff, at the time of taking the promissory note on which the suit is founded, knew that the mill-stories, which formed the consideration of the note, were defective; arid fraudulently concealed that defect from the defendant, the consideration wholly failed, and no suit could be sustained bn the note. Whetherthe plaintiff had or not a knowledge of the defect alleged, and concealed that knowledge from the defendant, was a question for the jury on the evidence, and the court could not [89] 'properly have instructed them, as prayed, that the. plain« tiff was entitled to recover.

áu»sheet affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sides v. Hilleary, 6 H. & J. 86 (Md. 1823).

6 H. & J. 86 (Sides v. Hilleary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dudoussat
17 So. 685 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1895)