Sidenstricker v. Miller Pavement Maintenance, Inc.

853 N.E.2d 666, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1258
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 2006·No. No. 2004-1739·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sidenstricker v. Miller Pavement Maintenance, Inc., 853 N.E.2d 666, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Ohio 2006).

853 N.E.2d 666 (Sidenstricker v. Miller Pavement Maintenance, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koss v. Kroger Co., 07ap-450 (6-5-2008)
2008 Ohio 2696 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
In Matter of A.E., 07ap-685 (3-25-2008)
2008 Ohio 1375 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)