Sidel v. Sidel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sidel v. Sidel

47 A.D.2d 876, 369 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9271

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 876 (Sidel v. Sidel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sidel v. Sidel, 47 A.D.2d 876, 369 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9271 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 28, 1974, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to reduce alimony to the sum of $5,000 per annum and support for each of the two infant children of the marriage to $7,500 per annum and to reduce counsel fee to $4,500 in addition to the sums heretofore paid, to be inclusive of this appeal, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The awards of alimony and support were disproportionate to the husband’s resources and to the reasonable needs of the family to the extent indicated, and counsel fee reduced as indicated is adequate for the services required in this uncomplicated litigation. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Tilzer and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 28, 1974, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to reduce alimony to the sum of $5,000 per annum and support for each of the two infant children of the marriage to $7,500 per annum and to reduce counsel fee to $4,500 in addition to the sums heretofore paid, to be inclusive of this appeal, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The awards of alimony and support were disproportionate to the husband’s resources and to the reasonable needs of the family to the extent indicated, and counsel fee reduced as indicated is adequate for the services required in this uncomplicated litigation. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Tilzer and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 876, 369 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidel-v-sidel-nyappdiv-1975.