Siddhartha Rath, MD and Durga Mekala, MD v. Dori Seimet

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)·Decided January 15, 2026·No. 02-25-00670-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-25-00670-CV

SIDDHARTHA RATH, MD AND DURGA MEKALA, MD, Appellants V.

DORI SEIMET, Appellee

On Appeal from the 342nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 342-363890-25

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On December 5, 2025, and December 19, 2025, we notified appellants, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless appellants paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellants have not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellants have not complied with a procedural requirement and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 15, 2026

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 1

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siddhartha Rath, MD and Durga Mekala, MD v. Dori Seimet, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Siddhartha Rath, MD and Durga Mekala, MD v. Dori Seimet (Siddhartha Rath, MD and Durga Mekala, MD v. Dori Seimet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.