Siddall v. Bregy

64 F. 610, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 4, 1894
DocketNo. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 64 F. 610 (Siddall v. Bregy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siddall v. Bregy, 64 F. 610, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070 (circtedpa 1894).

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The statement of claim in this case does not set forth a cause of action of which this court can take cognizance. The substance of the matters averred is that the defendant, by acts done or omitted by him in the exercise of his office as one of the judges of a court of the state of Pennsylvania, has caused damage to the plaintiff, who was a suitor before him; but this tribunal has no authority to review the judgments of the state courts, and hold their judges responsible for failure to correctly discharge their judicial duties. Judgment for defendant on the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 F. 610, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siddall-v-bregy-circtedpa-1894.