Siconolfi v. Lakeland Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siconolfi v. Lakeland Central School District

281 A.D.2d 469, 721 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2370

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 469 (Siconolfi v. Lakeland Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siconolfi v. Lakeland Central School District, 281 A.D.2d 469, 721 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Lakeland Central School District appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered January 7, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact as to whether the coaching staff negligently supervised the football team, and, if so, whether that negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see, Baker v Briarcliff School Dist., 205 AD2d 652). Krausman, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Lakeland Central School District appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered January 7, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact as to whether the coaching staff negligently supervised the football team, and, if so, whether that negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see, Baker v Briarcliff School Dist., 205 AD2d 652). Krausman, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 469, 721 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siconolfi-v-lakeland-central-school-district-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack