Sickley Brothers v. Michel Moore Company
162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 348, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 350
This text of 162 A. 582 (Sickley Brothers v. Michel Moore Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sickley Brothers v. Michel Moore Company, 162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 348, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 350 (N.J. 1932).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
Eor affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Brogan, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 348, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sickley-brothers-v-michel-moore-company-nj-1932.