Sickles v. McManus

Supreme Court of Missouri

Sickles v. McManus

26 Mo. 28

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1857

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 Mo. 28 (Sickles v. McManus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sickles v. McManus, 26 Mo. 28 (Mo. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This record abounds in errors, but it is unnecessary to notice them. The judgment must be reversed; though the execution of the bond had been proved or even admitted on [29]*29the trial, because the action on the administrator’s bond, in which the state was the obligee, can not be maintained in the name of the plaintiff. This point has been expressly decided in the case of the State to the use, &c., v. Moore, 19 Mo. 369.

The judgment is reversed,

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This record abounds in errors, but it is unnecessary to notice them. The judgment must be reversed; though the execution of the bond had been proved or even admitted on [29]*29the trial, because the action on the administrator’s bond, in which the state was the obligee, can not be maintained in the name of the plaintiff. This point has been expressly decided in the case of the State to the use, &c., v. Moore, 19 Mo. 369.

The judgment is reversed,

the other judges concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Mo. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sickles-v-mcmanus-mo-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack