Sickles v. McManus

26 Mo. 28
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This record abounds in errors, but it is unnecessary to notice them. The judgment must be reversed; though the execution of the bond had been proved or even admitted on [29] the trial, because the action on the administrator’s bond, in which the state was the obligee, can not be maintained in the name of the plaintiff. This point has been expressly decided in the case of the State to the use, &c., v. Moore, 19 Mo. 369.

The judgment is reversed,

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sickles v. McManus, 26 Mo. 28 (Mo. 1857).

26 Mo. 28 (Sickles v. McManus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Mather v. Carnes
551 S.W.2d 272 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1977)
Mitchell v. Williams
27 Mo. 399 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1858)
Miller v. Wall
27 Mo. 440 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1858)