Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 F. Supp. 3d 10 →

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 24, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2011-2224·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) DAVID SICKLE, et. al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 11-cv-2224 (KBJ) ) TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE ) SOLUTIONS, LLC, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

[10] is GRANTED;

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT shall be entered for the defendants.

This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).

DATE: December 24, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) DAVID SICKLE, et. al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 11-cv-2224 (KBJ) ) TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE ) SOLUTIONS, LLC, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

[10] is GRANTED;

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT shall be entered for the defendants.

This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).

DATE: December 24, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC, (D.D.C. 2013).

Pincite

Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC (Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.