Sickel v. Virginia
This text of 254 U.S. 619 (Sickel v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Argued January 17, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Murdock v. Memphis, 20 Wall. 590; Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 164; Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 601, 610; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 164. Mr, David H. Leake and Mr. Walter Leake, for plaintiff [620]*620in error, submitted. Mr. j. D. Hank, Jr., with whom Mr. John B. Saunders was on the brief, for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 U.S. 619, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sickel-v-virginia-scotus-1921.