Sichler v. City of New York

266 A.D.2d 129, 698 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12347

This text of 266 A.D.2d 129 (Sichler v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sichler v. City of New York, 266 A.D.2d 129, 698 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered March 28, 1997, after a jury trial, in defendant’s favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[130]*130The evidence provided ample basis for the jury to conclude that defendant did not breach a statutory duty and was not otherwise liable for plaintiffs’ injury. Any error in charging the jury on comparative negligence in this action, brought pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, was harmless (see, CPLR 2002), since the jury never reached the issue of comparative negligence. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 205
New York GMU § 205

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 129, 698 N.Y.S.2d 484, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sichler-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1999.