Siceluff v. State

52 Ark. 56
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Liquors: Sale to minor. As between a seller and an agent who deals-with him without disclosing the fact that he acts as agent, the latter, as well as the principal, is the purchaser.

A liquor seller who contracts with a minor may, therefore,, be convicted of selling liquor to a minor, notwithstanding the fact may subsequently be disclosed that the minor acted as. agent for his parent. Gillen v. State, 47 Ark., 555; Foster v. State, 43 Ark., 365; Ritcher v. State, 63 Miss., 304; Ross v. People, 24 Hun., 591; People v. Garrett, 36 N. W. Rep., 234; Com. v. McGuire, 11 Gray, 460.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siceluff v. State, 52 Ark. 56 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 56 (Siceluff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tony v. State
40 So. 388 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)