Siceluff v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Siceluff v. State

52 Ark. 56

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 56 (Siceluff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siceluff v. State, 52 Ark. 56 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Liquors: Sale to minor. As between a seller and an agent who deals-with him without disclosing the fact that he acts as agent, the latter, as well as the principal, is the purchaser.

A liquor seller who contracts with a minor may, therefore,, be convicted of selling liquor to a minor, notwithstanding the fact may subsequently be disclosed that the minor acted as. agent for his parent. Gillen v. State, 47 Ark., 555; Foster v. State, 43 Ark., 365; Ritcher v. State, 63 Miss., 304; Ross v. People, 24 Hun., 591; People v. Garrett, 36 N. W. Rep., 234; Com. v. McGuire, 11 Gray, 460.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Liquors: Sale to minor. As between a seller and an agent who deals-with him without disclosing the fact that he acts as agent, the latter, as well as the principal, is the purchaser.

A liquor seller who contracts with a minor may, therefore,, be convicted of selling liquor to a minor, notwithstanding the fact may subsequently be disclosed that the minor acted as. agent for his parent. Gillen v. State, 47 Ark., 555; Foster v. State, 43 Ark., 365; Ritcher v. State, 63 Miss., 304; Ross v. People, 24 Hun., 591; People v. Garrett, 36 N. W. Rep., 234; Com. v. McGuire, 11 Gray, 460.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ark. 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siceluff-v-state-ark-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack