Sicard v. Sicard
388 So. 2d 654, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23596
Opinion
Rejecting the appellant-husband’s only point on appeal, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s award of his interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Creel v. Creel, 378 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sicard v. Sicard, 388 So. 2d 654, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
388 So. 2d 654 (Sicard v. Sicard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosen v. Rosen
386 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Creel v. Creel
378 So. 2d 1251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)