Sicard v. Lewin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sicard v. Lewin

7 A.D.2d 847, 182 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10130

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 847 (Sicard v. Lewin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sicard v. Lewin, 7 A.D.2d 847, 182 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of this court entered on the 16th day of December, 1958 is vacated, and the motion is granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on Jerrolde L. May, former attorney respondent, and files six typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before February 19, 1959, with notice of argument for March 3, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., .Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of this court entered on the 16th day of December, 1958 is vacated, and the motion is granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on Jerrolde L. May, former attorney respondent, and files six typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before February 19, 1959, with notice of argument for March 3, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., .Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 847, 182 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sicard-v-lewin-nyappdiv-1959.