Sic v. Nunan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sic v. Nunan

23 A.3d 729, 301 Conn. 936, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 306

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 6, 2011

DocketSC 18816

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.3d 729 (Sic v. Nunan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sic v. Nunan, 23 A.3d 729, 301 Conn. 936, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 306 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 692 (AC 32196), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court order granting summary judgment should be reversed?”

ROGERS, C. J., and EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. [937]*937Decided July 6, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18816. Linda J. Morkan and Thomas A. Kyzivat, in support of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 692 (AC 32196), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court order granting summary judgment should be reversed?”

ROGERS, C. J., and EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. [937]*937Decided July 6, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18816. Linda J. Morkan and Thomas A. Kyzivat, in support of the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.3d 729, 301 Conn. 936, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sic-v-nunan-conn-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack