Sibley v. McConnell
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-730 (JEB)
THE HONORABLE MITCH MCCONNELL, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint is DENIED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED; and 3. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and 4. Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Remand is GRANTED; and 5. The case is REMANDED to D.C. Superior Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge
Date: October 13, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sibley v. McConnell (Sibley v. McConnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.