Sibley v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety

385 So. 2d 505, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 3955
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 5, 1980
Docket13258
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 385 So. 2d 505 (Sibley v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sibley v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety, 385 So. 2d 505, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 3955 (La. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

385 So.2d 505 (1980)

Michael SIBLEY
v.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

No. 13258.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 5, 1980.

*506 A. Wayne Stewart, Livingston, for plaintiff.

Michael C. Barron and Foye L. Lowe, Baton Rouge, for defendant.

Before ELLIS, PONDER and COLE, JJ.

PONDER, Judge.

This is an action for a restricted driver's license under the provisions of La.R.S. 32:415.1.[1] Defendant appealed from the order granting such a license.

The issues are whether plaintiff's petition stated a cause of action and the validity of the issuance of the license despite multiple prior suspensions and revocations.

We reverse.

In order for a restricted license to be granted, it must be the driver's FIRST suspension. Perry v. State, Dept. of Pub. Saf., Driver's L. Div., 353 So.2d 318 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977) writ denied 354 So.2d 1385 (La. 1978).

Plaintiff's failure to state in his petition that this was a first suspension is fatal to his claim.

There was and is no need to give permission to amend the pleadings so as to state a cause of action. As a matter of fact, plaintiff could not have truthfully stated a cause of action because plaintiff has two DWI convictions as well as speeding and reckless driving violations. He also has several violations for driving under a revoked license. His record shows five suspensions since 1975. There is evidence in the record of other suspensions for driving under a revoked license prior to 1975. Even the DWI convictions more than five years old are to be considered although these are not considered in assessing penalties for second and subsequent DWI convictions. Perry, supra.

The judgment is reversed at appellee's costs and the petition for a restricted driver's license is dismissed.

REVERSED.

NOTES

[1] LSA-R.S. 32:415.1 states in pertinent part:

"A. (1) Upon suspension, revocation, or cancellation of a person's drivers license for the first time only as provided for under R.S. 32:414(B), (C), (D), (E), and R.S. 32:415 said person after initial notice from the department shall have the right to file a petition in the district court of the parish in which the applicant is domiciled alleging that revocation of his driving privileges will deprive him or his family of the necessities of life or will prevent him from earning a livelihood."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuttle v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR.
579 So. 2d 1150 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Boe v. State
558 So. 2d 1333 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)
Hayden v. State, Department of Public Safety
534 So. 2d 58 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
Kleckley v. State, Dept. of Pub. Safety
502 So. 2d 213 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Mango v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
425 So. 2d 350 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)
Freeman v. State, Dept. of Public Safety
420 So. 2d 1246 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)
Crooks v. Department of Public Safety
401 So. 2d 638 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
Vice v. Department of Public Safety
393 So. 2d 357 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
Hickman v. Department of Public Safety
385 So. 2d 506 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 So. 2d 505, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 3955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sibley-v-louisiana-dept-of-public-safety-lactapp-1980.