Sibley v. Hoar
70 Mass. 222
This text of 70 Mass. 222 (Sibley v. Hoar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sibley v. Hoar, 70 Mass. 222 (Mass. 1855).
Opinion
Of the construction given to the written contract, the defendants have no ground of complaint, and the plaintiffs make none.
The matters of damage submitted to the jury were too contingent and remote.
The plaintiffs can take judgment for nominal damages, or a New trial in the cou/rt of common pleas.
The plaintiffs elected to take judgment for nominal damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 Mass. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sibley-v-hoar-mass-1855.