Sibley v. Hastings

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1880·Published

Opinion

Order appealed from reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Held, on the authority of Ross v. Mather (51 N. Y., 108), De Graw v. Elmore (50 Id., 1), Burnham v. Walkup (54 Id., 656), and Peck v. Root (5 Hun, 547), that the complaint sets out a cause of action for fraud and deceit, and no fraud having been proved, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sibley v. Hastings, 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110 (Sibley v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. . Mather
51 N.Y. 108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)