Sibley v. Hastings
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110
This text of 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110 (Sibley v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sibley v. Hastings, 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).
Opinion
Order appealed from reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Held, on the authority of Ross v. Mather (51 N. Y., 108), De Graw v. Elmore (50 Id., 1), Burnham v. Walkup (54 Id., 656), and Peck v. Root (5 Hun, 547), that the complaint sets out a cause of action for fraud and deceit, and no fraud having been proved, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ross v. . Mather
51 N.Y. 108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sibley-v-hastings-nysupct-1880.