Sibley v. Continental Supply Co.

292 S.W. 155, 116 Tex. 402, 1927 Tex. LEXIS 101
Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1927·No. Motion No. 7479.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The writ of error in this case was properly refused, regardless of the erroneous construction placed by the Court of Civil Appeals on Art. 2007 of the Revised Statutes. Plaintiff in error could not be heard to challenge the right of the court to determine the issue made by a plea of privilege and a controverting affidavit, after entering into an agreement in writing that the court should vacate a certain judgment against him, and thereafter hear and determine the question presented by the plea and the controverting affidavit thereto. Motion for rehearing is therefore overruled. *Page 403

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sibley v. Continental Supply Co., 292 S.W. 155, 116 Tex. 402, 1927 Tex. LEXIS 101 (Tex. 1927).

292 S.W. 155 (Sibley v. Continental Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Gulf Production Co.
149 S.W.2d 681 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Atwood C. B. F. v. Gallagher
73 S.W.2d 525 (Texas Supreme Court, 1934)
Brashears v. Strawn Nat. Bank
57 S.W.2d 177 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
City of Dallas v. Springer
8 S.W.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Redus v. Knox
2 S.W.2d 346 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
McKittrick v. McDaniel
300 S.W. 97 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)