Sibell v. . Remsen

New York Court of Appeals

Sibell v. . Remsen

33 N.Y. 95

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 5, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 33 N.Y. 95 (Sibell v. . Remsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sibell v. . Remsen, 33 N.Y. 95 (N.Y. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Pobtee, J.

The assignment under which the plaintiff claims was made in contemplation of insolvency by a manufacturing corporation organized under the general act of 1848. It falls directly within the prohibition of the statute, which condemns such instruments as utterly void. (1 R. S., 603, § 4; Harris v. Thompson, 15 Barb., 62; Robinson v. Bank of Attica, 21 N. Y., 406.)

The complaint was properly dismissed, and the judgment should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pobtee, J.

The assignment under which the plaintiff claims was made in contemplation of insolvency by a manufacturing corporation organized under the general act of 1848. It falls directly within the prohibition of the statute, which condemns such instruments as utterly void. (1 R. S., 603, § 4; Harris v. Thompson, 15 Barb., 62; Robinson v. Bank of Attica, 21 N. Y., 406.)

The complaint was properly dismissed, and the judgment should be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.Y. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sibell-v-remsen-ny-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack