Sibell v. . Remsen
33 N.Y. 95
Opinion
The assignment under which the plaintiff claims was made in contemplation of insolvency by a manufacturing corporation organized under the general act of 1848. It falls directly within the prohibition of the statute, which condemns such instruments as utterly void. (1 R. S., 603, § 4; Harris v. Thompson, 15 Barb., 62; Robinson v. Bank of Attica, 21 N. Y., 406.)
The complaint was properly dismissed, and the judgment should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sibell v. . Remsen, 33 N.Y. 95 (N.Y. 1865).
33 N.Y. 95 (Sibell v. . Remsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Brien v. East River Bridge Co.
36 A.D. 17 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Palmer v. . Van Santvoord
47 N.E. 915 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Muller v. Scandinavian & Finlander's Emigrant Co.
72 N.Y. St. Rep. 803 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1895)
Muller v. Scandinavian & Finlanders' Emigrant Co.
38 N.Y.S. 175 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
Smith v. Danzig
64 How. Pr. 320 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Pierce v. Crompton
13 R.I. 312 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1881)
Excelsior Petroleum Co. v. Embury
67 Barb. 261 (New York Supreme Court, 1875)