SIBEL EDMONDS, Individually and on Behalf of E. E., a Minor, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of LEWIS EDMONDS v. AVOW HOSPICE, INC.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 2026
Docket6D2025-0371
StatusPublished

This text of SIBEL EDMONDS, Individually and on Behalf of E. E., a Minor, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of LEWIS EDMONDS v. AVOW HOSPICE, INC. (SIBEL EDMONDS, Individually and on Behalf of E. E., a Minor, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of LEWIS EDMONDS v. AVOW HOSPICE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SIBEL EDMONDS, Individually and on Behalf of E. E., a Minor, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of LEWIS EDMONDS v. AVOW HOSPICE, INC., (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2025-0371 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-000447 _____________________________

SIBEL EDMONDS, individually and on behalf of E.E., a minor, and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF LEWIS EDMONDS,

Appellant,

v. AVOW HOSPICE, INC.,

Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.

March 13, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (holding

that the defendant had waived his Neil 1 objection when he accepted the jury

immediately prior to it being sworn without reserving his earlier objection);

Carratelli v. State, 961 So. 2d 312, 318-19 (Fla. 2007) (“Although Joiner involved

a Neil objection, district courts have applied it to jury selection issues in general,

1 State v. Neil, 457 So. 2d 481, 486 (Fla. 1984). including denial of cause challenges.”); Zack v. State, 911 So. 2d 1190, 1204 (Fla.

2005) (“By not renewing the objection prior to the jury being sworn, it is presumed

that the objecting party abandoned any prior objection he or she may have had and

was satisfied with the selected jury.”); see also Disla v. Blanco, 129 So. 3d 398, 402

(Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the

challenge for cause.”).

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Landis V. Curry, III, of Brannock Berman & Seider, Tampa, for Appellants.

Scott A. Cole and Francesca M. Stein, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carratelli v. State
961 So. 2d 312 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
State v. Neil
457 So. 2d 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Joiner v. State
618 So. 2d 174 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Zack v. State
30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 591 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Disla v. Blanco
129 So. 3d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SIBEL EDMONDS, Individually and on Behalf of E. E., a Minor, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of LEWIS EDMONDS v. AVOW HOSPICE, INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sibel-edmonds-individually-and-on-behalf-of-e-e-a-minor-and-as-fladistctapp-2026.